Teachers' Opinions on the Education Inspectors Regulation
Education Inspectors Regulation
Keywords:
Education administration, Inspection, Assistant inspector, AppointmentAbstract
The aim of this research is to examine the opinions of teachers set for the procedures regarding the principles of appointment as Assistant Education Inspector in accordance with the provisions of the Ministry of National Education Education Inspectors Regulation published in the Official Gazette on March 1, 2022, numbered 317685. The study used a qualitative research method, and data were collected from 91 teachers working at different education levels in various branches in the provinces of Elazig and Hatay during the 2022-2023 academic year. Researchers developed a semi-structured interview form as the data collection tool. The data were analyzed using content analysis, and based on the findings, it was observed that the opinions of the teachers were more specific that there is an experience requirement for assistant inspectors, but there is no age requirement, and assistant inspectors should not be selected from those without teaching qualifications. However, as the written exam varies based on the graduated faculty, the opinions of the teachers regarding the interview application after the written exam differ. Furthermore, within the scope of the study, suggestions were made for the appointment of assistant inspectors.
References
Akgün, M. (2023). Teacher’s views on supervision practies in puclic and private secondary schools: A qualitative study [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Aydın Adnan Menderes University.
Arslantaş, H. İ. (2007). An evaluation level of primary school inspector' role of professionel aid and uidance according to the perception of primary schoolteacher (a model proposal) [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Gaziantep University.
Aslanargun, E. & Göksoy, S. (2013). Who Should Supervise Teachers? Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, 98-121.
Aydın, M. (2014). Çağdaş eğitim denetimi [Contemporary educational inspection] (6th Ed). Gazi.
Balcı, B. (2007). The perceptions related to the implementation of the guidance roles of the inspector of the primary education and the directors of the primary schools [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Gazi University.
Başaran, İ.E. (2000). Eğitim yönetimi [Education administration]. Kadıoğlu
Bozak, A. (2017a). The opinions of the educational supervisors on legal arrangement about supervision system and on their occupation as supervisors. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 14(38), 90-110.
Bozak, A. (2017b). The Opinions of the educational supervisors on researches about supervision system. Elementary Education Online, 16(2), 453-468. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.304710
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış [New structure and behavior in school management]. Pegem A.
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2003). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama [Theory and practice in educational administration]. Pegem A.
Dalak, G. (2000). Denetim ve kalite denetimi/ Inspection and quality control. Muğla University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 1(1), 65–79.
Demirtaş, H., & Akarsu, M. (2016). Opinions of teachers regarding the ınspection of teachers by school principals ınstead of ınspectors. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(2), 69-93. DOI: 10.17679/iuefd.17251239
Durmaz, B., Bozkuş, M., Türk, M. M., & Üstündaş, V. (2023). Milli eğitim bakanlığı eğitim müfettişleri yönetmeliğine ilişkin eğitim müfettişi ve öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Research of the views of education inspectors and teachers on the regulation of education inspectors of the Ministry of National Education]. ULEDER, 3(1), 158-176.
Educators Trade Union [Eğitim Bir Sen] (2022, March 4). Eğitim müfettişleri yönetmeliği ihtiyacı karşılamamakta, hukuka aykırı hükümler içermektedir [The regulation on education inspectors does not meet the need and contains unlawful provisions]. https://www.ebs.org.tr/manset/5591/egitim-mufettisleri-yonetmeligi-ihtiyaci-karsilamamakta-hukuka-aykiri-hukumler-icermektedir
Education and Science Power Solidarity Union [Eğitim Gücü Sen] (2022, March 14). Eğitim müfettişleri yönetmeliği yaş sınırı maddesini iptal için danıştaya başvuruda bulunduk [We have applied to the council of state to cancel the age limit article of the education ınspectors regulation]. https://www.egitimgucusen.org.tr/hukuk/egitim-mufettisleri-yonetmeligi-yas-siniri-maddesini-iptal-icin-danistaya-basvuruda-bulunduk/
Education and Sciecnce Workers’ Union [Eğitim Sen] (2022, April 5). MEB eğitim müfettişleri yönetmeliği’nin yürütmesinin durdurulması ve iptali istemiyle danıştay’a dava açtık [We filed a lawsuit with the council of state for the suspension and annulment of the regulation on educational ınspectors of the MoNE]. https://egitimsen.org.tr/meb-egitim-mufettisleri-yonetmeliginin-yurutmesinin-durdurulmasi-ve-iptali-istemiyle-danistaya-dava-actik/
Erdem, A. R. (2006). Öğretimin denetiminde yeni bakış açısı: “Sürekli geliştirme” temeline dayalı öğretimin denetimi [A new perspective in the supervision of teaching: Supervision of teaching based on "continuous improvement]. The Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, 16, 275–294.
Ergün, H. (2020). Inspectors in Regulations. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 50, 141-157.
Ergün, M., Recepoğlu, E., Küçük, Z. A. & Oğuz, K. (2014). Analyzing post-graduate dissertations in educational supervision in universities of Turkey according to different variables. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(1), 25-40.
Güçlü, A. (2022, March 5). Sendikalardan Müfettiş Yönetmeliği'ne dava [Lawsuit from the Trade Unions to the Inspector's Regulation]. https://www.egitimajansi.com/haber/sendikalardan-mufettis-yonetmeligine-dava-haberi-83078h.html
Harris, B. W., Bessent, W. & Kenneth E. M. (1969). In-service education: A guide to better practice. Engle wood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Köybaşı, F., Uğurlu, C. T., Ağıroğlu Bakır, A. & Karakuş, B. (2017). Teacher opinions regarding classroom supervision in primary schools. Turkish Studies 12(4), 327-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11176
Labour Union of the Labourers of Education and Sciences [Eğitim İş] (2022, March 4). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı eğitim müfettişleri yönetmeliği’ne dava açtık [We filed a lawsuit against the education ınspectors regulation of the Ministry of National Education]. https://www.egitimis.org.tr/guncel/sendika-haberleri/milli-egitim-bakanligi-egitim-mufettisleri-yonetmeligi-ne-dava-actik-3809/#.ZCDKI3ZBxPY
Memişoğlu, S. P. (2016). The review of the regulations of ministry of national education counselling and discipline department and education ınspectorship department in the view of grad stundents' opinions. Turkish Studies, 11(3), 1703-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9200
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd Ed). Sage
Okur, Y. (2007). Türkiye'de kamu denetimi değişim süreci ve performans denetimi [Public audit change process and performance audit in Turkey]. Nobel
Öner, Ö. (2019). Examination of post graduate education theses in the field of education supervision in Turkey (1990-2017) [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
Özen, F., & Hendekçi, E. A. (2016). The descriptive analysis of academic studies published in Turkey about education supervision between the years of 2005-2015. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 6(11), 619-650.
Sarpkaya, R. (2004). İlköğretim denetmenlerinin denetim süresince karşılaştıkları sorunlar [Problems faced by primary school inspectors during the inspection]. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 5(8), (114–129).
Şahin, M. (2023). Teachers and administrators evaluations regarding the law on teaching profession. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(21), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1223552
Taymaz, H. (2015). Eğitim sisteminde teftiş [Inspection in the education system] (2nd Ed). Pegem A.
Turner, R. C. & Carslon, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5th Ed). Seçkin Publishing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
