Integration of STEM into Environmental Education: Preservice Teachers’ Opinions

Authors

  • Bekir Yıldırım Muş Alparslan Universtiy

Keywords:

Environmental education, STEM education, Preservice teacher, Opinions

Abstract

This qualitative study adopted a case study design to investigate preservice teachers’ opinions of a STEM-integrated environmental education program (STEM-IEEP). The sample consisted of 12 preservice teachers recruited using purposive criterion sampling. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Participants had positive views of the STEM-IEEP. They stated that it raised their environmental awareness and helped them develop positive attitudes towards the environment and find solutions to environmental issues. They also noted that it changed their views on environmental engineering for the better. Lastly, they believed that STEM education was vital because it helped them develop 21st-century skills and contributed to advances in technology. Recommendations were made based on the results.

References

Akkuş, A. (2020). Virtual classroom instruction during Covid-19 pandemic and students’ opinions. Hurrian Education, 1(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://www.hurrians.com/index.php/education/article/view/27

Arslan, Y., & Albay, F. (2019). The effect of outdoor sports as undergraduate elective course on environmental sensitivity. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(4), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n4p52

Arslan, Ö., & Yıldırım, B. (2020). The Effect of STEM practices on self-efficacy pedagogical and content knowledge of preservice teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(3), 1339-1355. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.789366

Aykan, A., & Yıldırım, B. (2021). The Integration of a lesson study model into distance STEM education during the covid-19 pandemic: Teachers’ views and practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09564-9

Alagoz, B., & Akman, O. (2016). A study towards views of teacher candidates about national and global environmental problems. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 483-493.

Bybee, W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Çakır, Z., Yalçın, S. A., & Yalçın, P. (2019). Investigation of the effects of pre-school teacher candidates creativity skills on montessori approach based STEM effectiveness. Journal of the International Scientific Research, 4(2), 392-409.

Çalışıcı, S., & Benzer, S. (2021). The Effects of STEM applications on the environmental attitudes of the 8th year students, scientific creativity and science achievements. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), 24-36.

Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the project based (PBL) science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education on academic achievement and career interests of vocational high school students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 8(2), 281-306.

Gigliotti, L. (1990). Environmental education: What went wrong? What can be done? The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 9-12.

Güler, T. (2009). The Effects of an ecology based environmental education on teachers’ opinions about environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151), 30-43.

Güven, E., & Hamalosmanoğlu, M. (2012). Evaluation of environmental education in 7th grade primary school in terms of an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of European Education, 2(2), 24-30.

Hacıoğlu, Y., & Gülhan, F. (2021). The effects of STEM education on the students’ critical thinking skills and STEM perceptions. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(2), 139-155.

Hamalosmanoğlu, M., & Güven, E. (2014). The Effect of Environmental Education Based on Interdisciplinary Approach to Students’ Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours. Turkish Science Education, 11(4), 47-62.

Helvaci, S. C., & Helvaci, I. (2019). An Interdisciplinary environmental education approach: determining the effects of E-STEM activity on environmental awareness. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 337-346.

Hibpshman, T. L. (2007). Analysis of transcript data for mathematics and science teachers. Frankfort, Kentucky: Education Professional Standards Board.

İnançlı, E., & Timur, B. (2018). Science teacher and teacher candidates' opinions about STEM education. International Journal of Science and Education, 1(1), 48-68.

Karademir, A., & Yıldırım, B. (2021). A Different perspective on preschool STEM education: Preschool STEM education and engineering for preservice teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 338-350.

Karahan, E., & Ünal, A. (2019). Gifted students designing eco-friendly STEM projects. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(4), 1553-1570.

Karakaya, F., Ünal, A., Çimen, O., & Yılmaz, M. (2018). STEM awareness levels of scienceteachers. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 5(1), 124-138.

Karalar, H., Sidekli, S., & Yıldırım, B. (2021). STEM in transition from primary school to middle school: primary school students' attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 687-697.

Karışan, D., & Yurdakul, Y. (2017). The Effects of microprocessors based science technology engineering and mathemetics (STEM) investigations on 6th grade students’ attitudes towards these subject areas. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Education Sciences, 8(1), 37-52.

Köse, M., & Ataş, R. (2020). The opinions of elementary teachers about STEM education. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 103-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.31805/acjes.828442

Kuvanç, M. (2018). The effectiveness of instructional design on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) based environmental education. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa: İstanbul.

Lai, C. (2018). Using inquiry-based strategies for enhancing students’ STEM education learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1) 110-117.

Li, X., & Wang, W. (2021). Exploring spatial cognitive process among STEM Students and its role in STEM education. Science & Education, 30(1), 121-145.

Makki, M.H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese secondary school students’ environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303468

Mercan, Y., & Işık Mercan, S. (2020). The relationship between environmental attitudes and behaviors and environmental sensitivity and perceived environmental risks. Humanistic Perspective, 2(3), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.763272

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Monroe, M. C., Andrews, E., & Biedenweg, K. (2008). A framework for environmental education strategies. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 6(3-4), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150801944416.

Musser, L. M., & Diamond, K. E. (1999), The children’s attitudes toward the environment scale for preschool children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 23–30.

Nguyen, T.P.L., Nguyen, T.H., & Tran, T.K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(21), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865

Ua-Umakul, A., & Chaiwatchatuphon, O. (2018). the effects of using STEM project-based learning activities on environmental problem-solving ability of upper secondary school students in bangkok metropolis. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 8(1), 1-8.

UN Environment. (2019). Global environment outlook—GEO-6: Healthy planet, healthy people. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ormancı, Ü. (2020). Thematic content analysis of doctoral theses in STEM education: Turkey context. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 126-146.

Özçakır Sümen, Ö., & Çalışıcı, H. (2016). Preservice teachers’ mind maps and opinions on STEM education implemented in an environmental literacy course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 459-476.

Palmer, J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st centruy: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

Saraç, E., & Doğru, M. (2021). Examination of prospective primary teachers' STEM education design and implementation experiences. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 9(1), 1-37.

Sarı, U., Duygu, E., Şen, Ö.F., & Kırındı, T. (2020). The Effects of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in simulation based inquiry learning environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3),387-405.

Stretch, E., & Roehrig, G. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 123-133.

Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M.B., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM approach to improve environmental education innovation and literacy in waste management: bibliometric research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 3(2), 130-141.

Tadena, M. T. G., & Salic-Hairulla, M. A. (2021, March). Local-based lesson on hydrologic cycle with environmental education integration: Designing learners ideas through STEM. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1835, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.

Tekerek, B., & Karakaya, F. (2018). STEM education awareness of preservice science teachers. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 348-359.

Türksoy, Ö. (1991). Cognitive approach in environmental awareness education: Child and basic environmental characteristics. Eğitim ve Bilim, 15(80), 15-17.

Türk, N., Kalaycı, N., & Yamak, H. (2018). New trends in hinger education the globalizing World: STEM in teacher education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1286–1304.

Uzun, N., & Sağlam, N. (2007). The environmental education in secondary school and teachers’ opinions on environmental education programs. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 176-187.

Wheaton, M., Kannan, A., & Ardoin, N. M. (2018). Environmental literacy: Setting the stage (Environmental Literacy Brief, Volume 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Widowati, C., Purwanto, A., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Problem-based learning integration in STEM education to improve environmental literation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 374-381.

Verdi, E., & Yıldırım, B. (2020). Fifth graders’ views on STEM activities: A Case study. Hurrian Education, 1(1), 42-49.

Yeşilyurt, M., Özdemir Balakoğlu, M., & Erol, M. (2020). The impact of environmental education activities on primary school students’ environmental awareness and visual expressions. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(2),188-216.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. İstanbul: Seçkin Yayınları.

Yıldırım, B., & Cumhur, T. (2018). The effect of STEM applications on girls' STEM attitude and engineering perception. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, (30), 842-884.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-18

How to Cite

Yıldırım, B. (2021). Integration of STEM into Environmental Education: Preservice Teachers’ Opinions. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 50–57. Retrieved from http://jstei.com/index.php/jsti/article/view/5