Student Satisfaction in Distance Education: A Research on Teacher Candidate



Distance education, distance teaching, satisfaction, teacher candidate, student satisfaction scale


The aim of this study is to examine the satisfaction levels of distance education students in terms of various variables. Survey study design, one of the quantitative research method designs, was used in the study. The study group of the research consists of 374 teacher candidate studying at Muş Alparslan University Faculty of Education. Within the scope of the purpose of the study, "Student Satisfaction Scale in Distance Education" was used to determine the satisfaction levels of the teacher candidate. According to the results obtained from the study, it was determined that the majority of the students had high satisfaction levels. It was revealed that students' satisfaction levels differed according to gender, previous distance education experience, computer usage level, mobile technology usage level, device used to connect to the internet, computer ownership status, ability to create content in digital environment, and level of solving technical problems encountered in digital environment. It was determined that the satisfaction levels of the teacher candidates did not differ according to the way they connected to the internet.


Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2), 83-97.

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7 (3).

Bartley-Bryan, J. (2010). Quality ındicators of successful distance learning by educational leaders: a caribbean case study. Retrieved from

Baturay, M.H., & Yükseltürk, E. (2015). The role of online education preferences on student’s achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). 3-12. Retrieved July 5, 2023 from

Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9 (3).

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. B., Akgün, Ö, E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Cameron, B. H., & Schofield, S. (2017). E-learning in global surgery. In R. P. Adrian Park (Eds.), Global Surgery: The Essentials (127-143). Springer.

Davis, L. (2018). The impact of computer use on distance education satisfaction. Journal of Distance Education, 39(2), 19-34.

Elmalı, İ., & Kuzu, A. (2020). Improving pre-service teachers’ digital skills in the process of distance education. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 11(2), 166-181.

Karataş, S. ve Üstündağ, M., T. (2008). The relationship between ınternet-based distance education satisfaction and demographic characteristics of gazi university distance education programme students. Yüzüncü Yıl University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(5), 62-73.

Kukul, V. (2011). Information technologies based distance education: Determination of satisfaction Levels of Students and Instructors (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Lee, J., & Rogers, D. (2021). Internet access and educational ınequality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(3), 123-137.

Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60 (1), 14-24.

McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). London: Pearson.

Moore, J. C. (2002). Elements of quality: The sloan-c tm framework. Olin College-Sloan-C. Retrieved July 5, 2023 from,+J.+C+(2002)&ots=sIaElXqIYp&sig=N7iI4-KC41CQY1jyYZBIapf_j7M&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Moore%2C%20J.%20C%20(2002)&f=false

Parlak, Ö. (2007). Student satisfaction scale in ınternet based distance education. Journal of Educational Sciences and Practice, 6(11), 53-72.

Reevy, G., Ozer, Y. M., & Ito, Y. (2010). Encyclopedia of emotion. Santa Barbara: Greenwood.

Sanchez Franco, M. J. (2009). The moderating effects of involvement on the relationships between satisfaction, trust and commitment in e-banking. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (3), 247-258.

Sudarwo, R., Umasugi, M., Hafel, M., & Simabur, L. A. (2020). Students’satısfactıon of dıstance educatıon servıces ın the ısland areas (a case study at upbjj-ut ternate). Terbuka Journal of Economics and Business, 1 (1), 1-13.

Şahin, A. E. (2009). Evaluation of service quality in the faculty of education with the faculty of education student satisfaction scale (EF-SSS). Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 37 (37), 106-122.

Şahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: the distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216–223.

Şimşek, N. (2012). Quality ındicators in distance education and evaluation of technology-based distance education in terms of these ındicators. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 11 (21).

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics: International edition. Pearson.

Tatlı, C. (2021). Analysis of the educational equivalence of different interaction types in distance education (Unpublished PhD Thesis) Ankara University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Tschetter, L. (2014). The impact of information technology skills on distance education satisfaction. Distance Education, 35(3), 345-366.




How to Cite

Tatlı, C. (2023). Student Satisfaction in Distance Education: A Research on Teacher Candidate . Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 3(2), 24–33. Retrieved from