Analysis of Geogebra Activities and Opinions of Primary Mathematics Teacher Candidates


  • Ebru Korkmaz


Dynamic geometry software, GeoGebra, Geometric objects, Elementary mathematics teacher candidates,


The research aims to examine the activities of primary mathematics teacher candidates with the help of Geogebra, dynamic geometry software, and their perspectives on Geogebra software. The working group consists of a total of 52 teacher candidates who studied in the spring semester of the 2020-2021 academic year of a state university in Eastern Anatolia. Research process that continues for a period (14 weeks - 28 hours); The introduction of Geogebra was made by actively processing the learning areas of triangles, polygons and quadrilaterals, geometric objects and transformational geometry with Geogebra. The mistakes made after the activities given in the middle of the semester and at the end of the semester were carried out by the teacher candidates were explained through intra-classroom discussions. A semi-structured open-ended question form was used as a data collection tool. In line with the findings, it was observed that some teacher candidates structured random shapes without knowing some characteristics that were obligatory to be in geometry and geometric objects. This was due to the lack of knowledge of the teacher candidates. It has been determined that teacher candidates who have the opportunity to think about the causality of rules and formulas have positive opinions such as interest, motivation increase, desire to use again. As suggestions of the research, some recommendations were made in the form of establishing Geogebra software in possible schools, introducing teachers and students, carrying out actions encouraging them to use actively, and teaching geometry and geometric objects by reification them.


Aktümen, M., Yıldız, A., Horzum, T., & Ceylan, T. (2011). The views of primary school mathematics teachers on the applicability of geogebra software in courses. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 103-120.

Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The effect of using mobile applications (geogebra and sketchpad) on the students' achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533.

Ayyıldız, A. (2020). The effect of geogebra assisted instruction on preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ academic performance and motivation: A sample of sequences. Necmettin Erbakan University Ereğli Faculty of Education Journal, 2(2), 152-174. http://doi:10.51119/ereegf.2020.3

Baki, A. (2000). Learning mathematics within a computer-based environment. Hacettepe Universtiy Journal of Education Faculty,19, 186-193.

Balcı-Şeker, H., & Erdoğan, A. (2017). The effect of teaching geometry with geogebra software on geometry lesson achievement and geometry self-efficacy. International Journal of Society Researches (OPUS), 7(12), 82-97.

Baltacı, S., Yıldız, A., & Kösa, T. (2015). The potential of geogebra dynamic mathematics software in teaching analytic geometry: the opinion of pre-service mathematics teachers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 483-505.

Barçın, H. (2019). The effect of using the subject of transformation geometry of mathematic lesson with geogebra software on maths success, anxiety and attitude of students. (Master Thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.

Bayaga, A., Mthethwa, M. M., Bossé, M. J., & Williams, D. (2020). Impacts of implementing Geogebra on eleventh grade student’s learning of euclidean geometry. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(6), 32-54.

Bhagat, K. K., & Chun-Yen, C. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into geometry learning-a lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 77-86.

Bintaş, J., Ceylan, B., & Dönmez, O. (2006). Probative learning through dynamic geometry software, contemporary trends in education. Constructivism and Its Reflections on Education Workshop (29 April). Tevfik Fikret Schools, İzmir.

Bu, L., Spector, J. M., & Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2011). Toward model-centered mathematics learning and instruction using GeoGebra: A theoretical framework for learning mathematics with understanding. Bu, L., & Schoen, R. (Eds.), Model-Centered Learning: Pathways to Mathematical Understanding Using GeoGebra (pp. 13–40). Sense Publishers.

Bakar, K. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Mahmud, R. (2015). Effects of GeoGebra on students' mathematics performance. In ABD Majid (Eds) Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics: Empowering Mathematical Sciences through Research and Education (pp. 180-183). Serdang, University Putra Malaysia: Institute for Mathematical Research. http://doi: 10.1109/ICREM.2015.7357049

Caligaris, G. M., Schivo, E. M., Romiti, R. M. & Menchise, S. M. (2017). Designing tools for Analytic Geometry: the Quadrics. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 219-228.

Condori, A. P., Velazco, D. J. M., & Fernández, R. A. (2020). November Geogebra as a technological tool in the process of teaching and learning geometry in. Conference on Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (Springer, Cham) pp. 258-271.

Celen, Y. (2020). Student opinions on the use of geogebra software in mathematics teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 84-88.

Ceylan, T. (2012). Investigating preservice elementary mathematics teachers' types of proofs in GeoGebra environment. (Master Thesis). Ankara University.

Demirbilek, M., & Özkale, A. (2014). Investigating the effectiveness of using geogebra in associate degree mathematics instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (EFMED), 8(2), 98-123.

Dikovic, L. (2009). Implementing dynamic mathematics resources with geogebra at the college level. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(3), 51-54.

Doğan, M. (2013). A dynamic math software: Geogebra (GeoGebra). M. Doğan & E. Karakırık (Eds.) Use of Technology in Mathematics Education, in (pp. 125-195). Nobel-Atlas.

Dogan, M., & İçel, R. (2011). The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 1441-1458. 1547.

Edwards, J. A. & Jones, K. (2006). Linking geometry and algebra with GeoGebra. Mathematics Teaching, 194, 28-30.

Er, S., & Sağlam-Kaya, Y. (2017). Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Views on Task Design at Geogebra Environment. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 13(1), 228-242.

Erdoğan, A., Baloğlu, M., & Kesici, Ş. (2011). Gender differences in geometry and mathematics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs in geometry. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 91-106.

Furner, J. M., & Marinas, C. A. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in teaching mathematics using photography and GeoGebra. The International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics Twenty-sixth Annual Conference, 134-143.

Furner, J. M. & Marinac, C. A. (2007). Geometry sketching software for elementary children: Easy as 1, 2, 3. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 83-91.

Filiz, M. (2009). The effect of using geogebra and cabri geometry II dynamic geometry softwares in a web-based setting on students? Achievement. (Master Thesis) Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon.

Gomez-Chacon, I. M. (2011). Mathematics attitudes in computerized environments: A proposal using GeoGebra. L. Bu and R. Schoen (eds.), Model-Centered Learning: Pathways to Mathematical Understanding Using GeoGebra (pp. 145–168). Sense Publishers.

Güven, B. (2002). Exploratory geometry learning within Cabri-Based environment. (Master Thesis), Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon.

Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 127-150.

Hohenwarter, M. (2004). Bidirectional dynamic geometry and algebra with GeoGebra. Proceedings of the German Society of Mathematics Education’s Annual Conference on Mathematics Teaching and Technology. Soest, Germany.

Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2004). Combination of Dynamic Geometry, Algebra, and Calculus in the Software System Geogebra. (

Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2007). Mathematics teacher development with ICT: towards an international GeoGebra institute. In D. Küchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. 27(3), 49-54.

Hohenwarter, M. & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications, 7, 1-29.

Hot, M. E., (2019). The effect of using dynamic geometry software in mathematics teaching on student's mathematics archievements. (Master Thesis) Akdeniz University, Educational Sciences Institute, Antalya.

İçel, R., (2011). Effects of Computer Based Teaching on Students’ Mathematics Achievements: Example of GeoGebra. (Master Thesis) Selçuk University, Institue of Science, Konya.

İlhan, A., & Aslaner, R. (2017). Investigation of the effects of the use of dynamic geometry software on the teaching of geometry subjects to visual mathematics literacy perception levels of elementary mathematics teacher candidates. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, NEF-EFMED. 11(2), 136-155.

İpek, J., Özmüş, P., Giziroğlu, G. & Kıyak, F. (2010). Pre-service mathematics teachers' perspectives on mathematics and art with dynamic geometry software: "Piet Mondrian example". International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications. Antalya, Türkiye.

Japa, N., Suarjana, I. M. & Widiana, W. (2017). Media Geogebra dalam pembelajaran matematika. International Journal of Natural Science & Engineering, 1(2), 40-74. ISSN: 2549-6395.

Jelatu, S. (2018). Effect of geogebra-aided react strategy on understanding of geometry concepts. International Journal of Natural Science & Engineering, 11(4), 325-336.

Jones, K., Lavicza, Z., Hohenwarter, M., Lu, A., Dawes, M., Parish, A., & Borcherds, M. (2009). Establishing a professional development network to support teachers using dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 29(1), 97-102.

Kabaca, T., Aktümen, M., Aksoy Y., & Bulut, M. (2011). Introducing the in-service mathematics teachers with the dynamic mathematics software geogebra and their views about geogebra. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 148-165.

Kaleli-Yılmaz, G., Ertem, E., & Güven, B. (2010). Dynamic geometry software of cabri’s influence on 11 grade students’ to learn in trigonometry issues. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 200-216.

Kan, O. (2014). The effect of geogebra assisted instruction on academic achievement in some issues of linear algebra course. (Master Thesis) Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.

Karaaslan, G., Karaaslan, K. G., & Delice, A. (2012). Teaching vectors and line equations in the analytical plane with the help of GeoGebra software. 2. Contemporary Approaches to Teaching Mathematics Symposium. Pamukkale Education Foundation, Denizli.

Kaya, A. (2017). The effect of geogebra as a dynamic mathematics software on students’ academic achievements: metaanalysis study. (Master Thesis) Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University.

Kusumah, Y. S., Kustiawati, D., & Herman, T. (2020). The effect of geogebra in three- dimensional geometry learning on students' mathematical communication ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 895-908.

Kutluca, T. & Zengin, Y. (2011). Evaluation of views of students about using geogebra in teaching of mathematics. Dicle University, Ziya Gökalp Journal of Education Faculty, 17, 160-172.

Küçük, K. (2019). Investigation of the effect of Geogebra based transformation geometry instruction on 7th grade students' achievement, beliefs and attitudes. (Master Thesis) Bartın University, Educational Sciences Institute.

MEB (2009). Elementary math lesson 6-8. classes syllabus and guide. Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Discipline. Ankara, Türkiye.

Mahmudi, A. (2010). Membelajarkan geometri dengan program geogebra. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. P6: Membelajarkan Geometri dengan Program GeoGebra.

Marrades, R., & Gutierrez, A. (2000). Proofs Produced by Secondary School Students Learning Geometry in a Dynamic Computer Environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 87-125.

Mingirwa, I. M. (2016). Teachers' technology uptake, a case of GeoGebra in teaching Secondary School Mathematics in Kenya. IST-Africa Week Conference, pp. 1-11, http://doi:10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2016.7530652.

Mutluoğlu, A., & Erdoğan, A. (2016). Examining primary mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) levels according to their preferred teaching styles. OPUS – International Journal of Society Researches, 6(10), 102-126.

Muslim, M., & Haris, A. (2017). Keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group ınvestigation pada materi geometri berbantuan geogebra ditinjau dari kemampuan representasi matematika dan self-efficacy. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pengembang Pendidikan Indonesia, October, pp. 438-46.

Özdemir, Ş. (2011). Using geogebra in game based learning: root numbers discovery game. 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259-275.

Ridha, M. R., & Pramiarsih, E. E. (2020). The use of geogebra software in learning geometry transformation to ımprove students' mathematical understanding ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477, (IOP Publishing) 42-48.

Santos-Trigo, M. & Cristóbal-Escalante, C. (2008). Emerging high school students´ problem solving trajectories based on the use of dynamic software. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 325-340.

Sarıtaş, M. (Ed.). (2013). Instructional technologies and material design. Pegem A.

Saputra, E., & Fahrizal, E. (2019). The development of mathematics teaching materials through geogebra software to improve learning independence. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 39-44. https://doi:10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1860

Selçik, N., & Bilgici, G. (2011). The effect of the geogebra software on students’ academıc achıevement. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19(3), 913-924.

Seloraji, P., & Eu, L. K. (2017). Students' performance in geometrical reflection using Geogebra. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 65-77.

Septian, A., Inayah, S., Suwarman, R. F. & Nugraha, R. (2020). August geogebra-assisted problem based learning to ımprove mathematical problem solving ability. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 467. SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019), pp. 67-71. Atlantis Press.

Septian, A., Darhim, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Geogebra in integral areas to improve mathematical representation ability. Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1613 012035. IOP Publishing. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012035

Septian, A., Darhim, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Mathematical representation ability through geogebra-assisted project-based learning models. 2nd ISAMME 2020 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1657 012019. IOP Publishing. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012019

Shadaan, P., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of using geogebra on students' understanding in learning circles. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1-11.

Sudihartinih, E., & Wahyudin, W. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis digital: studi penggunaan Geogebra berbantuan e-learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Tatsqıf, 17(1), 87-103.

Suryani, A. I., Anwar, Hajidin & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. The 7th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEADRIC 2019) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1470 012079. IOP Publishing. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012079

Sümen, Ö. (2013). The effect of teaching symmetry subject by geogebra software to mathematics success and anxiety. (Master Thesis) Ondokuz Mayıs University Educational Sciences Institute, Samsun.

Şahin, E., & Kabasakal, V. (2021). Using geogebra in STEM education: atwood machine example. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 9(1), 127-147.

Şahin, E., & Kabasakal, V. (2018). Investigation of students' views on the use of dynamic mathematics programs (geogebra) in STEM education approach. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (STEMES’18), 55-62.

Şimşek, N., & Yaşar, A. (2019). A thematic and methodological review of theses related to geogebra: a content analysis. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 290-313.

Tamam, B., & Dasari, D. (2021). The use of geogebra software in teaching mathematics. SEA-STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 1882 012042. http://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012042. pp 1-6.

Tatar, E., Akkaya, A., & Kağızmanlı, T. B. (2011). An analysis of the materials constructed with geogebra by primary prospective mathematics teachers and their views about dynamic mathematics software. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(3). 181-197.

Tüzer-Ünsal, G. & Akay, C. (2020). High school students' mathematics achievement, anxiety and attitudes towards ınstructional technologies: geogebra dynamic software. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(1), 234-252. http://doi:10.24106/kefdergi.3538

Uzun, P. (2014). The effect of instruction with geogebra on 7th grade students' academic achievement and attitudes toward geometry. (Master Thesis) Kastamonu University, Institute of Science, Kastamonu.

Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., Hohenwarter, M., & Schallert, S. (2020). Enhancing flipped mathematics education by utilising GeoGebra. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8(1), 1-15.

Wijaya, T.T., Ying, Z., & Suan, L. (2020). Using geogebra in teaching plane vector. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning (JIML), 3(1), 15-23.

Vatansever, S. (2007). The effect of learnıng the seventh grade prımary geometry subjects wıth dynamıc geometry software geometer’s sketchpad on success and permanence and the students’ opınıons. (Master Thesis) Dokuz Eylül University, Educational Sciences Institute. İzmir.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (11.Ed.). Seçkin Publishing.

Yorganci, S. (2018). A study on the views of graduate students on the use of Geogebra in mathematics teaching. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(8), 63-78.

Zakaria, E. & Lee, L. S. (2012). Teacher's perceptions toward the use of Geogebra in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 253-257.

Zengin, Y. (2017). The Investigation of the Effect of GeoGebra Software on Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Teaching Anxiety. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 908-939.

Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183-187. http://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038

Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Effect of use of geogebra on achievement of high school mathematics students. Educ. Inf. Technol., 25, 51-72.




How to Cite

Korkmaz, E. (2021). Analysis of Geogebra Activities and Opinions of Primary Mathematics Teacher Candidates. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 1–25. Retrieved from