An Examination of Pre-Service Visual Arts Teachers’ Metaphorical Perceptions of the STEAM Approach
Keywords:
STEAM, visual arts education, prospective teachers, metaphor analysis, phenomenology.Abstract
The traditional STEM model, which is primarily centered on engineering, mathematics, and technology, has gradually expanded over time to incorporate the arts, evolving into the STEAM approach. Accordingly, this study aims to examine prospective visual arts teachers’ perceptions of the STEAM approach through metaphor analysis. A phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research approaches, was adopted in the study. The participants consisted of 64 prospective teachers enrolled at a public university located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye, all of whom completed a four-week STEAM training program and microteaching practices. The data were collected using a metaphor form and analyzed through content analysis. The prospective teachers developed 33 different metaphors regarding the STEAM approach. These metaphors were categorized under six main themes. The prospective teachers described STEAM as a holistic structure in which different components complement one another, using metaphors such as “tree,” “rainbow,” and “weaving loom.” In addition, they emphasized the process-oriented nature of the approach through metaphors like “path,” “workshop,” and “puzzle”; its capacity to stimulate creativity through “invention” and “dreams”; and its curiosity-arousing character through analogies such as “circus” and “illusionist.” In conclusion, it was determined that prospective visual arts teachers perceive STEAM as a bridging model that integrates scientific thinking with the aesthetic and constructive power of art, actively engages students in the learning process, and fosters curiosity. This study provides a significant contribution to STEAM research from the perspective of arts education as well as to the teacher education literature.
Downloads
References
Bassachs, M., Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., Bubnys, R., & Colomer, J. (2020). Fostering critical reflection in primary education through STEAM approaches. Education Sciences, 10(12), 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120384
Başaran, M., & Vural, Ö. F. (2025). Perception of Teachers Towards STEAM and Inquiry-Based Teaching After STEAM Activities Training. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251388688.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209687
Erdoğan, S. (2020). STEAM ve sanat eğitimi ilişkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (44), 303–316.
Ergün, A., & Kıyıcı, G. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimine ilişkin metaforik algıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27 (6), 2513-2527.
Fabian, A. (2025). Metaphor as a cognitive tool in educational research. Contemporary Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 148–156.
Filipe, J., Baptista, M., & Conceição, T. (2024). Integrated STEAM education for students’ creativity development. Education Sciences, 14(6), 676.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemi (M. But un ve S. B. Demir, Ed. ve C çev.). Pegem Akademi Yayınları
Gülhan, F. (2022). Türkiye’de Yapılmış STEAM/[STEM+ A (Sanat)] Araştırmalarındaki Eğilimlerin Analizi. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 23-46.
Hong, J.-C., Ye, J.-H., Ho, Y.-J., & Ho, H.-Y. (2020). Developing an inquiry and hands-on teaching model to guide STEAM lesson planning for kindergarten children. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 908–922. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.908
Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education—A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198
Kashaka, N. D. (2024). Arts integration in stem education: A path to steam. Eurasian Experiment Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(3), 49-52.
Piila, E., Salmi, H., & Thuneberg, H. (2021). Steam-learning to mars: Students’ ideas of space research. Education Sciences, 11(3), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030122
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphor we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
López, P., Rodrigues-Silva, J., & Alsina, Á. (2021). Brazilian and Spanish mathematics teachers’ predispositions towards gamification in STEAM education. Education Sciences, 11(10), 618.
Montés, N., Zapatera, A., Ruiz, F., Zuccato, L., Rainero, S., Zanetti, A., ... & Marathefti, M. (2023). A novel methodology to develop STEAM projects according to national curricula. Education Sciences, 13(2), 169.
Mou, T.-Y. (2023). University students’ attitudes towards STEAM via a thematic 3D design project. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.294
Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410-426.
Sanz-Camarero, R., Ortiz-Revilla, J., & Greca, I. M. (2023). The impact of integrated STEAM education on arts education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci1302014
Silva-Hormazábal, M., & Alsina, Á. (2023). Exploring the impact of integrated STEAM education in early childhood and primary education teachers. Education Sciences, 13(8), 842.
Smolin, L., & Preston, E. A. (2025). Centering Art Practices: A Narrative Inquiry Into Elementary Teachers’ STEAM Integration. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 26(17).
Spyropoulou, N., & Kameas, A. (2023). Augmenting the impact of STEAM education by developing a competence framework for STEAM educators for effective teaching and learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 25.
Van Manen, M. (2016). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315415574
Wade, C. B., Koc, M., Searcy, A., Coogle, C., & Walter, H. (2023). STEAM activities in the inclusive classroom: Intentional planning and practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1161. doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111161
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Purdue University Proceedings.
Zengin, M., & Uğraş, M. (2019). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının STEM eğitimine ilişkin metaforik algılarının belirlenmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, (77), 57-76.
Zheng, H.-B., & Song, W.-J. (2010). Metaphor analysis in the educational discourse: A critical review. US-China Foreign Language, 8(9), 42–49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.